POTS and PANS and little PAIN

If you have been around the telecom world for any length of time, you know that the term ‘POTS’ has nothing to do with the latest cooking accessory on the Food Network. When we refer to Plain Old Telephone Service, we are talking about standard copper phone lines, like the ones you would find in your home. For years, the aphorism has been to install these POTS lines as the backup to modern digital services, as POTS typically work when most other systems fail, require no power, and any regular telephone from Radio Shack (if you can find a store) can be plugged in, delivering a basic level of service.

There is no doubt that the advancement of the cellular telephone networks has been one of the most astonishing communications transitions altering our lifestyle today. In fact, we often wonder how we researched anything without Google, how we got anywhere without Waze, and how I had a medium pizza with sausage and onions delivered to me no matter where I was on the planet. This, in addition to our common communications modality of choice, has caused a paradigm shift in the way we think about communications resiliency and redundancy and the use of POTS lines.

Dear old Mother Bell and all of the other ‘Traditional Carriers’ are also feeling the same effect of this digital transformation to IP and wireless services. Across the country, POTS are being replaced by PANS (Pretty Advanced New Stuff) in the form of digital fiber optic networks. The legacy analog copper-based networks lining our highways and countryside are routinely being abandoned and/or replaced with fiber-based facilities.

For example, in the Northeast alone, Verizon has filed formal notices with the FCC stating that the wire centers (central offices) listed below are planning to be decommissioned are planned. These are all copper-based facilities where fiber will take over services. Each notice below has a link to Verizon’s official notice to the FCC, and contains a list of the specific Central Offices affected, as well as the addresses they serve.

DELAWARE Copper CO Retirements

MARYLAND Copper CO Retirements

MASSACHUSETTS Copper CO Retirements

NEW JERSEY Copper CO Retirements

NEW YORK Copper CO Retirements

PENNSYLVANIA Copper CO Retirements

RHODE ISLAND Copper CO Retirements

VIRGINIA Copper CO Retirements

Not to worry as this may not be too terrible. Not only are the new facilities more capable of high-speed data, they provide remote alarming, management and diagnostic capabilities. When designed in a ‘ring-topology’ they can also provide near-instantaneous failover and reroute, in the unlikely event of a failure in the infrastructure, ultimately increasing uptime. Compare this against a copper infrastructure that provides limited alarming during an outage, and only hub and spoke connectivity, I’ll go out on a limb and say that a digital fiber facility can ultimately provide a better service level and overall uptime, despite having to rely on power, which can be resolved with various levels of battery back-up and solar-battery solutions.

This ultimately raises the question: “Do I need to keep a POTS line installed for life-safety services like 911 in my remote office where I only have IP phones or VoIP based trunking?” While my answer in past years would have been “Yes, absolutely!”, given today’s environment, with cellular penetration being reported by the CTIA at all-time record highs, and carriers continuously abandoning legacy copper-based networks when they fail, I would have to seriously question if a POTS line is still more reliable than a PANS circuit? With cellular being so ubiquitous, can this be an option as the primary back-up? Likely ‘yes’, but as John Chiaramonte of Mission Critical Partners reminds us, “An important topic for all in 911 today” are reports like the recent one from the US GAO that stated, “During [2009 to 2016], the number of outages substantially increased from 189 to 1,079 outages, with most of the increase occurring from 2009 to 2011.”

CTIA is the organization that collects facts about wireless deployments and produces a sobering report each year.  In the latest report for 2016, the numbers look like this based on the data found in the Annual Industry Wireless Survey available at https://www.ctia.org/industry-data/ctia-annual-wireless-industry-survey.

Screenshot 2018-01-14 13.13.21

Table Courtesy of CTIA: https://www.ctia.org/industry-data/ctia-annual-wireless-industry-survey

Wireless penetration (as of 2016) is now over 120%. That means there are 1.2 cell phones for every US citizen. On top of that, 66% of those subscribers are Smartphones capable, not only of voice communications but IP-based data communications. Given these sobering statistics, it is not hard to understand my hesitation to say that a POTS circuit remains a suitable backup for a PANS circuit. The fact of the matter is that times have changed; what was is no longer, and as we move forward we need to look to new services and adapt our current best practices and operational guidelines to accept a little bit of PAIN (Publicly Available Internet Networks) a.k.a. public wireless broadband.

I believe PAIN (you heard it here 1st) is a fitting acronym for Next Generation communications facilities. Fitting, because they can be a ‘PAIN’ to manage, but only because of their newness to many. We need to think towards the future, and cannot expect to apply old standards to manage new technologies. Everyone including Carriers, Enterprises, and consumers alike need to adapt, embrace, and adopt these important changes as they bring a host of new services and capabilities that enhance our lifestyle during network sunny-day periods. For the occasional rainy-day scenario, with the proper monitoring, planning and actionable backup plans in place, we can all hide out under an umbrella until the clouds clear.

fletch-sig

Please follow me on Twitter @Fletch911, Listen to my Podcasts on APN, and subscribe to my Blogs on Fletch.TV.

It all started with a Big Bang! . . . Then a call to 911

FOR AN AUDIO PODCAST VERSION OF THIS BLOG – CLICK HERE

We are likely all familiar with the Simpsons episode, where Homer frantically screams, “Help, Operator! Give me the number for 911!” Although we find this humorous in the United States, there are still quite a few places around the globe that haven’t adopted 911 or 112 (found deployed across the European Union) as their primary mechanism to reach local emergency services. In a recent article published by the Samoa Observer over the holidays, 911 has just been adopted there, to help alleviate the confusion caused by Samoa’ s multiple emergency numbers .

Happy Birthday 911!

Coming on February 9th of 2018, the United States will be celebrating 50 years of this life-saving emergency number. This small town in northwestern Alabama took the prize to be the first community delivering this service when Alabama Speaker of the House, Rankin Fite officially inaugurated the system at 2 PM with a call to 911 that was answered by Congressman Tom Bevill at the Haleyville Police Department, where that historic red phone is still on display under glass case.

Why a Special Number?

Prior to the existence of any emergency number, such as 999 in the UK, 000 in Australia, 112 in Europe, or 911 in the United States, the purpose of the number remains the same worldwide. Even today in Samoa, Minister of Communications and IT, Afamasaga Rico Tupa’i was quoted stating that the primary reason to implement 911 was to, “[move] from three different emergency numbers (994; 995; 996) to one particular number which is 911.”

In most emergency districts, emergency services is broken up into three separate areas. Police, fire, and EMS or medical. With many agencies acting independently from each other in the past, the dispatching and command-and-control of those services also operated independently. But, with most other things, consolidation at certain levels makes sense from cost efficiency as well as workflow optimization. Because of this, it’s very common to see multiple services tightly coupled from a dispatch perspective. In Europe, many agencies remain in their silos for command-and-control, however they have removed the decision making process from public view by implementing a single 112 emergency number that terminates in a specialized center that is able to triage the situation, provide preliminary pre-arrival instructions, and seamlessly transfer to the appropriate agency based not only on the type of emergency, but the location of the incident. This similar model has also been deployed in many areas of the United States, where a County facility will provide centralized call taking for all emergency services, then coordinate with the appropriate agencies as needed.

What about Next-Generation Emergency Services?

With NG Emergency Services literally right around the corner, you may wonder if governments like Samoa are making a smart investment deploying a legacy environment today, and not waiting a few months for the “latest and greatest.” That dilemma, is one that every agency fights, and has been fighting, for several years. Fortunately, the industry can learn through its many years of experiences bringing technology to its current state. For example, when I started in telecom in the mid-80s, I was introduced to ATTMail, an internal email system that AT&T used to communicate between sales reps and their distributors. Being an installer, I saw little use of the tool, but I know it provided those that scheduled my work a new level of collaboration with the field representatives selling product.

Back then, for all intents and purposes, the Internet didn’t really exist, for the public at least. Connectivity was done through point-to-point dial-up services, and limited to 1200 and 2400 baud modems. As for the content, the emails were all simply ASCII text, keeping payload to a minimum. The use of email didn’t really explode until online services such as CompuServe and AOL became available to the masses, providing some level of connectivity between users. Even then, those communities of interests could easily communicate with each other, but communicating with someone else on a different network proved to be difficult.

Finally, we experience the Internet explosion. This modern day “big bang” provided basic connectivity between just about everyone, and every device. But the emergency networks remained as one of the last holdouts, citing fears of cybersecurity and total anarchy if hackers got into the system. While we have seen some minor exploitation of emergency networks across the globe, for the most part, the extensive forensics that are deployed on the network that track financial and government facilities, have proven to be very useful in quickly identifying the culprits of any attack, as well as quickly block and tackling the network, minimizing risk.

The NENA i3 framework for NG Emergency Services not only addresses the network itself, but addresses the transition from legacy networks, as well as the interoperability with legacy networks, knowing that there is no magic “switch” that can be flipped to move from one to the other.

Therefore, countries like Samoa, can purchase with confidence today a new fully compliant NENA i3 NG emergency services PSAP, and connect it to their legacy PSTN network without any worry through a Legacy Network Gateway. Likewise, if a country decides to deploy a NENA i3 NG emergency services ESInet framework, their existing legacy infrastructure can connect on day one through a Legacy PSAP Gateway. NENA i3 already addresses interoperability on both sides of the equation, and in both directions.

END to END Emergency Services at AVAYA ENGAGE

Avaya is a leader in contact center technology, worldwide. We are also a leading provider of Enterprise Communications solutions. Taking our deeply rooted history across the telecom industry, it is no wonder that we have taken that experience and fostered relationships with key partner from our DevConnect program, and formed a synergy of solutions we like to refer to as Avaya Public Safety Open Connect Partners. These partners make up the core framework of the End to End, Avaya Public Safety Solution from the Enterprise to the PSAP, and from Citizens to PSAP, and then extending that further with future connectivity to first responders in the field providing critical information from the people who have the data, to the people who need the data, and in an as needed timeframe, so the information is both actionable and relevant.

We will be showing this LIVE in the main Avaya booth at the Public Safety Pedestal, and interconnected with Select DevConnect Partners Conveyant Systems, Beta 80 International, and Engelbart Software. Through this localized ESINet, we will provide live video and media content from the incident, and from the AVAYA ‘Eye in the Sky” Drone to not only the dispatcher, but to the first responder through collaborative communication.

 

 

1461 Days of Mourning

Today, I gladly turn my blog over to a man,  friend and a father who suffered the worst tragedy possible. For the past 4 years, I have been educating, lobbying, and pleading with legislative leaders and technical authorities to recognize and promote the correction of a terrible issue that is simple, and affordable to fix.  At the core of this problem is Hank Hunt, a simple east Texas Cowboy/Photographer that loved his daughter like I have never seen before. The story is a simple one and can be found at http://KariHuntFoundation.com where you can self-educate, and even offer to help if so inclined.

December 1st marks 4 years since my daughter was murdered.

Taken in a brutal way by someone she thought would never do what he did. He lied, he mislead, he tricked and lured her to a small room in a hotel where, once he knew she was determined to leave him, he asked for one last hug. That was the way he did it. She willingly let him put his arms around her, thinking, hoping this would finally seal it for him. Instead, the hug turned to a grab and hold with one arm while the other arm began stabbing her, relentlessly. She screamed to her oldest daughter, 9 years old at the time to call 911. She also screamed, “Brad you’re killing me!” He didn’t care, that was his goal. Her 9 year old immediately began dialing 911 from the hotel room phone. All she heard was static, and her mother screaming, as she continued to dial 911, a simple number created to reach help in an emergency. Nothing, she tried a total of four times but not knowing that at some hotels you need to dial an access number to get an “outside line” such as a “9” then the number you are calling, she never was answered. Since then, I along with 100’s of others have fought to change this and we are making progress, I feel confident we will see Kari’s Law a reality. Yesterday, I discovered that the Dispatchers, (call takers) at our local 911 call centers were once again denied having the classification of “1st Responders” instead they will continue to be classified as “Clerks” “Clerical”. Why? They are trained to assess the situation, determine what is happening, initiate immediate dispatch and continue with life saving instructions all without seeing the problem such as those who arrive at the scene with as much knowledge as they can get from the very “clerk” that answered the call, asked the appropriate questions and assessed the situation with life-saving knowledge they have trained for. I firmly believe that had my granddaughter gotten an answer that day the “Clerk” would have known the words to say that very well could have saved my daughter if not, the help she so desperately needed would have arrived long before she died allowing a greater chance for survival. Are Dispatchers, Telecommunicators, call takers 1st Responders? I think so! Besides, when the people currently classified as 1st Responders return from a call aren’t there reports being written and filed? Doesn’t that make them “Clerical”?

Hank Hunt – Kari’s Dad

Hank, you have my deepest sympathy for your loss. Your entire family has suffered for the past 1461 days, and there is nothing I or anyone else can do to prevent that or even eliminate that from continuing. What I CAN DO, and what I will commit to you is the following:

I will continue to use everything in my power to help you on your mission to ensure no other child is ever put in the situation where the phone in front of them will not dial 9-1-1 to reach emergency service dispatcher’s – America’s FIRST 1st responders.

fletch-sig

911 for Christmas? Think Twice BEFORE you buy

An Audio Podcast version of this Blog is available on the AVAYA PODCAST NETWORK

Last year, a very popular gift for the holiday season was a “911 Emergency Pendant” from a large television shopping retailer. It was advertised as a “lifesaving product”, and targeted at those who were living in, or had loved ones residing in a senior living establishment. It was also targeted at those living at home alone, clearly pulling at the heartstrings of those watching the broadcast. The unit was advertised as one having a single purchase price, which was just below $100 with their special $50 off offer, and the only one in the world that had no monthly fee for service, and the device worked “anywhere in the country”.

Being someone in the 911 industry, and understanding at a deep level how 911 works, I found this product a little hard to believe. Obviously, if it works anywhere, cellular technology would be required to provide service “anywhere in the country”. If cellular service was in use, there would be no possible way to provide that service, and included in a one-time purchase price that was less than $100.

To me, it became very clear what was happening here. Since June of 1996, an FCC report and order has mandated that cell phones making 911 emergency calls must be routed to the Public Safety Answer Point (PSAP)  without any interception by the carrier for credit checks or other validation procedures. This is commonly known as the NSI (Non-Service Initialized) rule. The origin of the bill had excellent merit. With the massive popularity of cellular phones, and the regular upgrade cycle from users, the number of devices left over from previous plans grew exponentially. As a case in point, I have three of them sitting on my desk in front of me as I write this.

It was decided that since cell phones were still uncommon with the general public, these spare phones would make excellent gifts to those who were financially less fortunate. With the NSI rule in place, the devices could be distributed to the financially needy, spouses who were victims of abuse, and a quick inexpensive panic button for anyone who needed to reach 911.

It wasn’t long before this rule became exploited by those looking to profit from the emergency services industry. Low cost, inexpensive chipsets could be manufactured and placed in a cheap plastic housing for just a few dollars, and Viola!  You have an emergency “panic button” style device able to call 911! So what’s wrong with this picture?

The main problem is, the 911 network, and 911 PSAP’s were not designed to deal with calls from these types of devices. Since the devices are NSI devices with no service plan, they have no telephone number. Since they have no telephone number, they fall outside of the operational model of the cellular 911 network. Some of the problems that become quickly apparent:

  • Location information is often unavailable.
  • If location is available, it’s often the cell tower and not the device.
  • If the user doesn’t know where they are, 911 can’t accurately locate them.
  • There is no telephone number, so a call back is impossible.

 

  • The device may not reach the proper PSAP.

 

With all of these potential failures, is this really something you want to put into the hands of a loved one? The ABC12 News Team in Emmet County Michigan found out that the one PSAP in northern Michigan decided they were not going to go down without a fight.  They resorted to Social Media by posting on their Facebook page exposing their thoughts through a warning about the device that was claiming to help people contact 911.

The Charlevoix, Cheboygan and Emmet Central Dispatch Authority reported that their test of the pendant did not work and urged residents to directly dial 911 reach authorities during an emergency. They detailed the situation where a local resident brought the device in trying to get help activating it after unsuccessful attempts on his own. Tests from the residents home, the 911 PSAP parking lot, and even from inside the 911 center itself, all failed to work as promised. The device did not provide any location information to the 911 center, so if the caller is unable to speak, or doesn’t know where they are, dispatchers would not be able to help them. The CCE Central Dispatch Facebook Page is available at http://facebook.com/CCE911

Provide your Location with Only 3 Words

Disclaimer: 
The author or Avaya Inc. has no business agreement or financial tie 
to What3Words. This article is based on the interest of the author 
to investigate new technologies and foster the advancement of Public 
Safety and the use of Next Generation technology to provide a safer, 
more robust architecture using common technology.

Ask anyone in public safety and they will tell you that the most critical information, yet often the most elusive, is the location of the caller. Not only is the location accuracy grossly inadequate with most mobile devices today, often a caller is unaware of what their “dispatch-able address” is. This twofold problem creates an issue for public safety dispatchers. Not only do they do rely on the technology in the network to route the call correctly, but the inability of that technology to give them a discreet location puts the onus on the caller to be able to convey that information to the 911 call taker.

WANT THE AUDIO VERSION?

Here is the E911 Talk Podcast of this Blog:

For example, this morning I had breakfast at my local luncheonette. I was inside a single story commercial structure, in a strip mall environment. Google tells me that the closest cellular tower to my location is about 2185 feet away (.41 miles) – pretty close, huh?

Screenshot 2017-10-07 18.00.51

While I’m familiar with the name of the establishment, I wouldn’t have the first clue to what the address is. I know from previous experience, having called 911 before while in this establishment, the 911 call taker only got Phase 1 level location providing the sector and cell tower centroid.

To an ordinary individual, this would seem like it would be information that was quite accurate and usable. But while the data is relevant, it is not germane to the situation. I was physically located at the Skyline Luncheonette, 129 Skyline Dr. Suite 7, Ringwood, NJ 07456, United States of America, but conveying that information to a Public Safety dispatcher would not have been an easy task for me. But fortunately, there is a better way.

What if I could convey all that location information, with 3 m² accuracy to anyone else on the planet with just three simple words? Fortunately, that is reality, and it’s available today. Don’t believe me? Well, let me prove it to you:

I was located at the three words:  enjoy-ladder–oath or https://map.what3words.com/enjoy.ladder.oath

Screenshot 2017-10-08 12.35.36

Putting those words in the What3Words app presents you with the precise location of where I was; down to the seat I was sitting in. While I don’t expect you to remember, or even know, enjoy–ladder–oath, you could quickly retrieve the location in an app, and that could be used by public safety dispatchers to understand exactly where you were.

Just to be clear, the What3Words app is NOT a location discovery technology, The App is a simple way to translate an explicit point on the planet, with 3 m2 accuracy, too anyone with an internet connection. They can then extract the longhand location and the actual geodetic information held within this ‘location container’ shorthand.

Around the world, car manufactures are also starting to take notice of this technology. Recently, Mercedes-Benz announced plans to launch “in vehicle 3 word address navigation”, following Daimler’s partnership with the What3Words addressing system.

As Next Generation Emergency Services becomes more common, and we start adding in the ability for intelligent endpoints to communicate ‘data’ instead of phone numbers, as we are restricted to with the existing archaic architecture, we need to start thinking about new efficient ways to transport the data from where it exists, to where it is needed.

To do that will require disruption to and industry that normally shy’s away from dynamic change, but that is what disruption is all about anyway, right?

 

fletch-sig

FCC Announces MLTS ECS NOI Agenda

My role at Avaya is to manage the product various offerings as they pertain to public safety solutions in the enterprise. Additionally, this includes public safety answer points. From a legislative and regulatory perspective, I work with various agencies. These include the Federal Communications Commission, as well as recognized standards development organizations, known as SDOs, like NENA, the National Emergency Number Association, EENA, the European Emergency Number Association, and APCO International, the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials.

For an audio version of this Blog, check us out HERE:

This particular work is probably the most important of what I do. It sets the stage for legislative guidance within the industry, ensuring that best practices and technically feasible solutions are specified and deployed.

In the United States, the Federal Communications Commission regulates interstate and international communications that take place by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and US territories. The FCC is an independent US government agency that is overseen by Congress and has been designated as the federal agency that is responsible for implementing and enforcing America’s communications law and regulations.

So how does Rulemaking work at the FCC?

Each time that Congress wishes to enact a particular piece of legislation that affects telecommunications in the United States, the FCC is tasked with developing rules to implement any specific law required to codify that legislation. To carry out its work, the Commission will then take specific regulatory steps to formulate and enforce these rules.

Fortunately for US Citizens, these steps offer consumers an opportunity to submit comments as well as reply comments to the FCC to be considered during the process.

The Commission’s decision-making process is well defined, albeit brings forth a whole new chapter in the ‘Alphabet Soup’ served as a daily special served at Chez’ Telecom. Here is a quick guide to understanding the “alphabets” of the FCC.

  • Notice of Inquiry (NOI): The Commission releases an NOI to gather information about a broad subject or as a means of generating ideas on a particular issue. NOIs are initiated either by the Commission or an outside request.
  • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM): After reviewing comments from the public, the FCC may issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. An NPRM contains proposed changes to the Commission’s rules and seeks public comment on these proposals.
  • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM): After reviewing your comments and the comments of others to the NPRM, the FCC may also choose to issue an FNPRM regarding specific issues raised in comments. The FNPRM provides an opportunity for you to comment further on a related or specific proposal.
  • Report and Order (R&O): After considering comments to a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (or Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making), the FCC will issue a Report and Order. The R&O may develop new regulations, amend existing rules or make a decision not to do so.

Summaries of the R&O are published in the Federal Register. The Federal Register summary will tell you when a rule change will become effective. Not quite as entertaining as general legislation, and we have no “I’m just a Bill” theme song, but the process is efficient, and most importantly gets public and commercial input, as well as the contribution of specific experts to the legislation at the very start.

On Tuesday, September 26, 2017, Chairman Ajit Pai has announced that the September Open Meeting will include an agenda item:

911 Access, Routing, and Location in Enterprise Communications Systems
The Commission will consider a Notice of Inquiry that seeks comment on the provision of 911 by enterprise communications systems that serve businesses, hotels, educational institutions, and government entities.

This will be heard under Public Safety and Homeland Security Docket 17-239 and is a direct result of the issues raised by Avaya on behalf of Hank Hunt, Kari’s Dad. Around the world, this is commonly known as Kari’s Law and has over 650,000 supporters on Change.Org after Hunt created the petition after the tragic death of his 31-year old daughter Kari Hunt, on December 1, 2013, in Marshall Texas. Kari’s 9-year old daughter knew to dial 9-1-1 from the hotel room phone but was unable to because a ‘9’ was needed for an outside line. Versions of the Bill have passed the House and US Senate and are ready to be joined and sent to the Whitehouse.

In addition to the important aspects defined by Kari’s Law, Direct Access, On Site Notification, and Routing without Interception, this new FCC NOI covers additional important aspects, including affordable implementation, management and testing of solutions. For more information on the FCC Proceeding, you can watch the September Open Meeting LIVE on the Internet at http://fcc.gov/live, and the public is welcome to attend in person at the FCC, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.

For more information about Kari’s Law, you can visit the Kari Hunt Foundation at  https://www.KariHuntFoundation.com where you can read the story, and contribute to their cause in educating the public so a child is never faced with the situation where 911 will not reach public safety on the phone.

Follow me on Twitter @Fletch911
Check out APN on Spreaker and iHeart Radio

Fletch_Sig

Is Text Messaging Just Dying or Dead?

The United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) will be dropping support for Short Message Service SMS in favor of email alerts going forward. Is this a sign of the times? Is texting getting too long in the tooth, and are citizens looking for other more multi-media rich content? The following letter was distributed today advising of the discontinuance of the popular service via SMS. This makes me wonder if Text to 911 hasn’t missed the boat with only about 20% of the PSAPs being deployed with the functionality. Should they be focusing on multimedia and omnichannel communications from the public?

U.S. Department of Homeland Security US-CERT

US-CERT to Discontinue SMS Text Messages

US-CERT will be discontinuing SMS text messages (wireless alerts) this month. To ensure you continue receiving the latest information about security topics and threats, please update your subscriber profile to include an email address. Alternatively, subscribe here using your email address.

If you’re receiving this notification via email, you do not need to take any action. As we approach October, National Cyber Security Awareness Month, consider sharing the following link with friends and family so that they can stay current on risks potentially affecting their systems and data: https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas. At the bottom of every US-CERT.gov webpage is a link to subscribe to email alerts.

Affected topics:

  • National Cyber Awareness System Mailing Lists
    • Alerts
    • Bulletins
    • Tips
    • Current Activity
  • Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team (ICS-CERT)
    • Alerts
    • Advisories
    • Announcements
    • Year in Review
    • Monitor Newsletter
  • Critical Infrastructure Cyber Community Voluntary Program (C3VP)
    • C3VP Updates

Please contact info@us-cert.gov with any questions or concerns. Thank you.

United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT)